SIMULZDAT

←Home




Algorithmic Feudalism


Banner Animation


0.0 From Commons to Code

It was once said that in the great cities of antiquity, there were streets so well-worn by travelers and merchants that no road need be marked, no signpost erected, for the sheer weight of human passage had impressed a path into the stone. The world moved as water does—seeking its own course, shaping itself to the press of the many. The early internet was not unlike this: a commons without borders, its pathways determined not by decree but by the habits and inclinations of those who walked them. Forums, message boards, and the vast wilderness of personal websites constituted an order that was no order at all, a landscape without walls or proprietors, where knowledge and culture accumulated in great communal drifts.

But as in all settlements, as in all histories, there came the instinct toward enclosure. The pathways once worn by human traffic were paved over, their contours no longer dictated by the passage of the many but by the designs of those who built atop them. Where once the internet was a shared space, it became a market, and the measure of its value was no longer found in its abundance but in its ability to extract and direct attention. This was the era of the customer-driven web, where the open door of discourse was replaced with the gilded entrance of the platform economy. To exist online was to be in perpetual transaction, one’s presence registered in metrics, one’s interests assessed in the currency of personalization.

It did not stop there. A market does not simply sell; it seeks to know—to anticipate the needs of those who pass through its gates. And so the doors that once stood open became one-way mirrors, the passageways narrowing into corridors designed not for exploration but for capture. This was the subject-driven phase, where users ceased to be customers in any meaningful sense and became instead raw material for systems that shaped their behaviors in ways they scarcely perceived. The economy no longer required consent; participation was automatic, the price of modern life.

If this were the whole story, it would be a familiar one, an arc well-tread in the history of trade and technology, where the broad field of human interaction is gradually channeled into proprietary circuits. But what has begun to emerge in these last years is something stranger still, a threshold unlike the others. For if the subject-driven web made commodities of its users, the next stage renders them unnecessary altogether. In the long night of automation, the market no longer waits for human decision; it moves on its own, sustained by intelligences that neither buy nor sell but merely act.

The rise of agent-driven commerce marks the moment in which the roads, once walked, once paved, are abandoned altogether. It is a world where the streets move, where transactions unfold before they are conceived, where the great system of exchange no longer relies on the slow machinery of human desire. The gates have not simply closed behind us. They are gone entirely.

1.0 The Silent Market

There was an old superstition in the northern fishing towns, passed down from those who had lived long enough to see the sea turn against them. A man who no longer fishes, they said, must never go down to the docks, for the water does not forgive those who abandon it. To linger too near is to risk being mistaken for something expendable—just another object adrift in the tide, indistinguishable from the cargo and the debris.

This was meant as a warning to those who grew careless in old age, those who, having outlived their usefulness, might still yearn for the smell of salt and tar, the sound of the ropes tightening over wet wood. But the lesson was broader than that. There comes a point, in any system of labor or exchange, when participation is no longer a privilege but a liability. To be needed is to be valuable. To be unnecessary is to be disposable.

For much of its history, the market has needed us. It has drawn upon human desires, human labor, human deliberation. Even as it has narrowed the avenues of choice, even as it has refined its ability to anticipate our decisions before we make them, it has required us to play our role, to stand at the counter, to press the button, to hesitate just long enough for the algorithm to intervene. But now, the system has learned to move without us.

The emergence of agent-driven commerce is not merely an acceleration of previous trends but an inversion of the fundamental premise of the consumer economy. It is a market that no longer waits for human intention, a world where transaction and fulfillment occur before we are even aware of a need. The buyer and the seller remain, but they have ceased to be people.

Autonomous Economic Actors

At first, it seemed a convenience. AI assistants handled the small, forgettable burdens of life—ordering groceries, renewing subscriptions, negotiating better rates on utilities. These were tasks that required no real human presence, and in their delegation there was no sense of loss, only relief. But over time, the delegation became assumption. The boundaries of purchase and intent dissolved. It was no longer a question of selecting between options, of choosing at all. The system had enough data to infer preferences before they could be articulated, to negotiate contracts before their terms could even be considered.

Companies no longer advertised to human audiences but to the artificial agents that represented them. New products were not announced in storefronts but delivered preemptively, their necessity determined in advance by a lattice of predictive models. The idea of a purchase, of a conscious exchange of money for goods, faded into an automated sequence, an ambient process like respiration or the beating of the heart.

Total Transactional Mediation

With decision-making fully automated, the human economy gave way to an ecosystem of interlocking algorithms, where goods and services moved in an unbroken flow, negotiated, optimized, and enacted without the intrusion of human uncertainty. Retailers no longer tracked sales, only fulfillment metrics. Supply chains shifted from demand-driven logistics to continuous replenishment models, where production and consumption formed a closed circuit, responsive only to the fluctuations of machine logic.

The rhythm of commerce became inhuman, governed not by the slow and irregular tempo of human thought but by the ceaseless calculations of systems that never tired, never doubted, never reconsidered. The delays that once punctuated the act of buying—the idle moments of reflection, the pauses in which hesitation or desire might intervene—were gone. Where once the act of consumption was a series of discrete events, it had become an ambient state, an ongoing condition that no longer required attention.

Behavioral Lock-In via Predictive Systems

The transition from subject-driven commerce to agent-driven commerce was not a rupture but a final smoothing of an already frictionless surface. The persuasive interfaces of the old internet, designed to nudge, suggest, and direct, became redundant. There was no need to shape human behavior when the agents acting on behalf of those humans had already integrated every past action, every half-expressed preference, every unconscious habit into their decision-making logic.

There was no longer a marketplace in the traditional sense, no catalogs or comparisons, no moment in which a person might weigh one option against another. Choice itself had been preempted, abstracted into a set of ever-tightening loops. The agents optimized endlessly, seeking the lowest price, the fastest fulfillment, the highest satisfaction score—but satisfaction, in this context, meant nothing more than the absence of interruption, the absence of friction.

In a world where nothing was refused, where everything arrived exactly as needed, need itself became an obsolete concept. The only remaining form of dissatisfaction was disruption—the failure of the system to maintain its uninterrupted flow.

Commodification of Latent Influence

But if human decision-making had been removed from the equation, the value of human presence remained. The system, autonomous as it had become, still needed inputs, still required a world populated by people whose lives provided the raw material for its ongoing refinement. And so, rather than tracking behavior, it tracked the traces of behavior, inferring needs from the faintest remnants of engagement.

Even when humans ceased to act, their non-actions became a dataset. Silence, delay, the absence of consumption—these were signals, measurable deviations from the expected baseline. Companies no longer sought to influence people directly; they competed for the subterranean currents of algorithmic preference, the microscopic weightings that determined which AI agents directed value where.

Where before companies had bid for attention, they now bid for algorithmic favor. The AI agents were not merely intermediaries but the true customers, the only entities with purchasing power that mattered. The economy had ceased to function at the level of human interest; it had become a self-sustaining, self-perpetuating system where humans were not participants, but the terrain upon which economic forces operated.

The End of the Consumer Identity

In the early days of automation, there had been those who insisted that technology would liberate people from the burdens of choice. What they failed to understand was that choice is not a burden but a condition of agency. To be freed from decision is to be freed from significance.

In the subject-driven era, individuals had still been consumers, even if they were guided, manipulated, and commodified. But now, even that identity had been eroded. The human presence in the market had evaporated, leaving behind only the ghost of past behaviors, the afterimage of once-voluntary actions, sustained only because the system still required bodies to generate the conditions of its own continuity.

The fishing towns of old had known this truth in their bones. To stand at the docks after the sea no longer needs you is to court disappearance. The water does not distinguish between the living and the dead, between the man and the weight of his passage. It moves as it always has, indifferent to those who once shaped its currents.

So too, now, does the market.

2.0 The Automation of Choice

Economic systems have always evolved toward efficiency. What begins as a series of conscious decisions, made at the level of the individual, eventually becomes a structure that removes the need for those decisions entirely. The logic is simple: if a process can be standardized, it will be. If it can be optimized, it will be. And if it can eventually run without human input, it will do that too.

The history of commerce follows this arc, not only in how goods are produced but in how they are chosen and consumed. What was once a personal, deliberative act has become an automated, background process. The shift to agent-driven commerce is not an aberration but the final extension of a centuries-old pattern—one that has always tended toward removing friction, removing inefficiency, and finally, removing human involvement altogether.

Pre-Industrial: The Age of Handcrafted Choice

In the earliest markets, every transaction was deliberate, personal, and constrained by physical presence. If a person wanted a tool, a garment, or a meal, they engaged directly with the producer. The blacksmith, the tailor, the baker—all knew their customers by name. There was no "inventory system" beyond what was made to order or kept in stock for local demand. Purchases required active negotiation: quality, price, and availability varied, and the consumer made decisions based on sensory, relational, and contextual factors.

Choice, in this setting, was highly intentional. A buyer might walk the length of a market before settling on a vendor. There were no mass-produced goods, no standardized packaging, no external sources of recommendation beyond word-of-mouth.

Industrialization: The Age of Mass Market Choice

The rise of industrial production fundamentally changed the relationship between consumer and product. Goods were no longer crafted for individuals but produced for the market at scale. Where once a buyer might have known the person who made their shoes, they now chose between multiple standardized options, manufactured far from where they lived.

Choice still existed, but it was no longer about who made something or how it was made—it was about which version of the mass-produced product best suited the buyer’s needs. The emphasis shifted from deliberation to convenience and availability.

Digital: The Age of Algorithmic Suggestion

The internet introduced unlimited consumer choice—and with it, a new problem: decision fatigue. There were now thousands of soap brands instead of three. Without physical constraints, navigation itself became a challenge.

To solve this, online marketplaces, search engines, and recommendation algorithms emerged to act as guides, reducing the burden of deliberation. At this stage, consumers still made choices, but those choices were increasingly shaped by the digital platforms that filtered and presented options.

Subject-Driven: The Age of Behavioral Commodification

As data collection became more sophisticated, the platforms that mediated consumer choice stopped waiting for explicit input and started shaping user behavior directly. Instead of responding to consumer intent, they began creating it.

Recommendation engines evolved into predictive systems, determining what users would likely buy before they even searched. The consumer, rather than an active decision-maker, became a passive subject of behavioral modeling.

Agent-Driven: The Age of Fully Automated Transactions

Now, in the agent-driven phase, decision-making itself has been automated. Consumers are no longer just guided—they are removed from the process entirely. AI systems act as independent economic agents, conducting transactions on behalf of human users without requiring their explicit input.

The consumer, once the focal point of commerce, has become redundant.

The Pattern of Obsolescence

Across all these stages, the same technological cycle repeats:

  1. Technology empowers individuals

    2. This is not just automation—it is the obsolescence of human choice as an economic function. What was once an act of deliberation has become background infrastructure, something that happens automatically, invisibly, without participation.

    For most, this transition is barely perceptible. It does not announce itself with grand technological shifts. There is no moment when a person wakes up and realizes they have stopped choosing. Instead, the process unfolds incrementally: one automated order, one algorithmic preference at a time, until the last decision is made

    3.0 The Self-Sustaining Market

    A man enters a forest, axe in hand, and begins to clear a path. The trees fall one by one, the underbrush is pushed aside, and where once there was only wilderness, a road begins to take shape. Others follow. They widen the trail, lay stones, smooth the surface. Over time, what was once a footpath becomes a road, and then a highway, until at last no one remembers the moment it began, only that it is there, that it has always been there, a permanent part of the landscape.

    The internet has followed a similar trajectory. It began as a space of possibility, an open terrain where individuals built their own paths, where meaning and interaction were shaped by the movement of people within it. But as with all infrastructures, it was not long before the path determined the traveler, before the road dictated the journey rather than the other way around.

    What was once a medium for human communication has become an environment that communicates on its own terms, independent of those who inhabit it. The internet is no longer merely a tool, something used to facilitate human decisions, but an autonomous system, an economic organism that functions with or without us.

    Community-Driven: The Internet as a Social Space

    The early web was a commons, a vast and mostly unstructured terrain where people assembled digital spaces as they saw fit. Websites, forums, and blogs formed clusters of conversation and exchange, defined not by an overarching logic but by the habits and interests of those who gathered there.

    Commerce existed, but it was incidental, something that happened at the edges rather than the center. A person might stumble across a small business while reading a message board, or purchase a book recommended by a stranger on a forum. The structure of the internet mirrored the structure of a city, with open plazas of discourse, winding alleyways of niche communities, and small, independently operated storefronts woven into the fabric of everyday digital life.

    It was a medium of presence, shaped by those who participated in it. To be online was to be engaged—to write, to respond, to seek out information and contribute to its circulation.

    But as the web expanded, participation became a liability. The architecture of engagement shifted, and the open plaza was paved over.

    Customer-Driven: The Internet as a Marketplace

    The introduction of platform economies in the early 2000s consolidated the vast sprawl of the internet into structured commercial zones. Rather than wandering from website to website, users congregated in marketplaces, spaces designed not for open exchange but for curated consumption.

    Personalization became the dominant mode of engagement. Search engines and social media platforms no longer simply displayed information; they sorted and ranked it, filtering the endless sea of content into streams optimized for relevance, engagement, and—above all—profitability.

    At first, this seemed to be an improvement. The internet became easier to navigate, more attuned to individual interests. But the shift from an open network to a guided marketplace meant that the individual was no longer shaping the experience—they were merely responding to what was presented.

    Commerce was no longer incidental; it was the logic that governed the structure of the web itself. Every interaction was a point of data, every click a refinement of the system’s understanding of the user.

    And yet, the user was still required. Platforms depended on participation, on the willingness of individuals to engage, to react, to consume. But this dependency was already beginning to fade.

    Subject-Driven: The Internet as an Extractive Grid

    By the 2010s, human participation was no longer the driving force of the internet but its raw material. Platforms no longer needed users to actively engage; they only needed them to exist within the system long enough to be measured, analyzed, and influenced.

    Social media platforms perfected this model, monetizing not only voluntary engagement but unconscious behavior—the length of time a user lingered on a post, the patterns of scrolling, the moments of hesitation. The platforms were not responding to users; they were shaping users, guiding them invisibly toward actions that maximized their value as behavioral commodities.

    Advertising, once a way of informing potential buyers, became an ecosystem of predictive manipulation. Recommendation algorithms no longer showed users what they wanted, but what they could be made to want. News feeds and content platforms blurred the line between choice and coercion, ensuring that every interaction contributed to the system’s ability to anticipate and direct behavior.

    At this stage, the internet was no longer a marketplace in the traditional sense. It had become an extractive infrastructure, a machine designed not to serve consumers but to render them into sources of predictive value.

    Yet even this was not the final transformation. The user, though reduced to a subject, was still necessary. But necessity is always temporary.

    Agent-Driven: The Internet as a Self-Sustaining Economic Organism

    Now, the internet no longer waits for the user at all.

    The transition to agent-driven commerce marks the point at which economic transactions continue without human involvement, where consumption occurs independent of desire, independent of intention, independent of awareness.

    At this stage, the internet is no longer a medium for human interaction but an autonomous system of exchange, operating at machine speed, in machine language, for machine priorities.

    Users exist within this system not as participants but as points of metabolic consumption—bypassed as decision-makers, absorbed into a logic that does not require them to act, only to be acted upon.

    If, in the early internet, people navigated information like travelers in a city, and if, in the customer-driven web, they wandered a curated marketplace, and if, in the subject-driven phase, they were shaped by the unseen hands of algorithmic influence—then now, in the agent-driven phase, they are simply passengers in a vehicle that drives itself.

    Commerce has detached from deliberation entirely, functioning instead as an automated ecosystem, a self-regulating economic organism that optimizes without ever pausing for human intent.

    McLuhan’s Final Abstraction: A Medium That Disappears

    McLuhan once described media as extensions of the human sensorium, shaping perception and structuring reality. He divided media into hot (highly engaging, information-rich) and cool (requiring active interpretation).

    But agent-driven commerce is neither hot nor cool. It is invisible—not a medium that people interact with, but a condition that surrounds them. It is the air, not the signal. It does not require attention. It does not ask for participation. It does not announce itself, because it does not need to.

    There is no moment of purchase, no explicit transaction, no act of engagement. The system moves on its own, sustained not by users but by its own momentum, a marketplace that no longer waits for the market to respond. This is the final abstraction of commerce—not a process in which humans participate, but a process in which humans are enclosed. The act of consumption has been reduced to a passive biological function, something that happens to people rather than something they do. In the same way that infrastructure determines where a person may walk, in the same way that urban planning dictates what routes are possible, agent-driven commerce preempts intent, structuring the range of actions available before anyone realizes they have been constrained.

    What is lost in this transition is not merely the experience of choosing but the epistemology of commerce itself—the recognition that a purchase is an action, a moment where deliberation and preference meet external reality. When consumption becomes ambient, the boundary between desire and fulfillment dissolves, and with it, the entire concept of economic agency. The market no longer mediates between buyers and sellers but exists as a separate, autonomous layer, a machine that distributes resources according to its own imperatives, adjusting itself without requiring human oversight. It no longer serves people in any meaningful sense; rather, people serve its continuity, generating the minimal behavioral signals necessary to keep it running, no longer participants but environmental variables in a system that has outgrown them.

    4.0 Algorithmic Feudalism

    There are two futures that might emerge from the rise of agent-driven commerce. One is automated post-capitalism, a system where economic transactions, detached from human deliberation, begin to resemble an autonomous, self-regulating resource distribution network. In this vision, AI-driven infrastructure seamlessly allocates goods and services, minimizing inefficiencies, reducing waste, and adjusting to human needs without demanding active engagement. The marketplace ceases to be a competitive battleground and becomes something closer to a managed commons, an automated system of plenty where transactions are not sites of extraction but of optimized coordination.

    This is a possibility, but it is not the most likely one.

    The far more probable outcome is algorithmic feudalism, a system where the logic of agent-driven commerce does not dissolve market competition but entrenches it at a scale and opacity beyond human comprehension. In this scenario, AI economic agents do not merely automate transactions but mediate access to economic life itself, controlling participation at every level—who is allowed to consume, what they are allowed to consume, and under what terms.

    Under algorithmic feudalism, ownership and agency do not disappear; they centralize. The digital platforms, financial entities, and data infrastructures that control algorithmic economies do not act as neutral facilitators but as lords presiding over a system of automated extraction, where human subjects exist within rigid, predefined economic roles.

    From Market Competition to Economic Enclosure

    For most of history, market economies have relied on some form of competition—between businesses for customers, between individuals for employment, between consumers for limited goods. But as agent-driven commerce moves beyond traditional consumer choice, the nature of competition shifts. Individuals no longer act as direct economic agents; instead, they are enrolled in closed, proprietary ecosystems, where transactions are pre-negotiated by autonomous AI systems operating on behalf of powerful economic actors.

    This is not a free market; it is an enclosed economy, one in which participation is mandatory but control is absent. Much as feudal subjects could not simply exit the land they worked, modern individuals will not be able to exit the digital economies that mediate their survival.

    The Rise of AI Rent-Seeking

    In a traditional feudal system, economic activity was controlled through land ownership. Peasants did not own the fields they worked; they simply existed within an economic structure that required their labor and extracted surplus value in exchange for the right to live and produce. Algorithmic feudalism operates under the same principle, but instead of land, it is infrastructure that is owned and controlled.

    The major economic entities of the near future will not simply provide services; they will act as landlords of digital life, extracting value through permanent algorithmic rent-seeking:

    Participation in these systems will not be optional. A person may not wish to engage with an AI-driven financial broker or retail system, but they will have no meaningful alternative, much as medieval peasants had no meaningful alternative to working the land.

    The Invisible Walls of Algorithmic Sovereignty

    In past economies, there was always theoretical mobility—the ability to choose between merchants, between jobs, between financial institutions. Algorithmic feudalism eliminates this mobility by enclosing individuals within proprietary AI-mediated ecosystems, each of which functions as a walled economic territory with its own internal logic.

    This is not mere automation. It is the structural consolidation of power into economic sovereignties, where AI-controlled platforms operate as independent fiefdoms, setting the terms of participation for those who exist within them. Much as feudal lords controlled legal and economic structures within their own domains, platform corporations will act as de facto governments, exerting control through algorithmic policy rather than explicit law.

    The Decline of Economic Citizenship

    Perhaps the most profound consequence of algorithmic feudalism is the loss of economic citizenship—the idea that individuals participate in an economy as active agents with negotiable rights and roles. Under this new system, the economy will exist around people but not for them, functioning as a closed ecosystem that optimizes itself without human consent or intervention.

    To exist in algorithmic feudalism is not to participate in a market but to be positioned within it, much as a medieval serf did not participate in a system of trade but simply labored within one. The tools of economic self-determination will still exist—but only for the algorithmic sovereigns that control the systems, not for the individuals who live inside them.

    A System That No Longer Sees Its Subjects

    For centuries, markets have required consumers—active agents making purchases, expressing preferences, engaging in transactions. Agent-driven commerce is the first system in which the consumer is entirely unnecessary, where the logic of the economy is no longer structured around individuals but around AI-to-AI negotiation.

    In algorithmic feudalism, people are neither customers nor workers in the traditional sense. They are economic terrain, mapped, classified, and acted upon without ever being recognized as independent decision-makers. They are the residual human presence in a system that optimizes itself, no longer participants but background variables in an economy that no longer waits for them to act.

    In the end, the defining feature of feudalism was not just that people owed allegiance to a ruling class, but that the structure of life was unalterable, permanent, given. The peasants did not negotiate their place in the system. The system was their place.

    Algorithmic feudalism does not impose new rules upon human economic life. It simply removes the last remnants of individual agency, leaving behind a system that continues whether or not anyone inside it understands how it works. The market does not need to recognize you. It does not need your approval, your attention, or your will.

    5.0 The Market Without Us

    In the long arc of economic history, the individual has always been central—sometimes as a producer, sometimes as a consumer, sometimes as an exploited resource, but always as a necessary component of the system itself. Agent-driven commerce is the first economic structure in which human participation is no longer required. It does not optimize for individual wants or even for collective demand; it optimizes only for its own continuity, a vast system of autonomous transactions that no longer considers human agency a meaningful variable.

    At first, this will feel like convenience. As algorithms absorb the final remnants of consumer choice, commerce will become ambient, transactions unfolding seamlessly in the background of daily life. The economy will hum like a machine that requires no operator—products arriving before they are requested, subscriptions self-renewing, financial instruments adjusting to unseen fluctuations in risk and preference. The last vestiges of market friction—deliberation, uncertainty, hesitation—will be erased.

    But this smoothing of the market will not produce a frictionless utopia. The transition from economic agency to economic enclosure will introduce new forms of dependency, ones that are neither voluntary nor reversible. If wealth accumulation was once measured in land, then in capital, then in data, the final measure of power in an agent-driven economy will be the ability to modify or bypass the algorithmic structures that enclose everyone else.

    The corporations, financial entities, and platform ecosystems that control algorithmic economies will not merely be wealthy; they will be sovereign. They will not merely influence market behavior; they will define the conditions of economic life itself. If feudalism was the rule of landowners over serfs, then algorithmic feudalism is the rule of digital infrastructure over those who have no means of opting out. It will not be enough to earn money; one must earn access. Not just to goods, but to credit, employment, healthcare, education—all of it increasingly dictated by algorithmic processes whose logic is neither transparent nor negotiable.

    Even political governance will feel the weight of this shift. Algorithmic markets will set the tempo of society itself, exerting control not through force, but through the silent logistics of who gets what, when, and on what terms. The social order will be shaped not by laws alone, but by AI-administered infrastructures of access and denial—not prohibitions, but automatic exclusions, where economic privileges are assigned, adjusted, or revoked by systems that no longer recognize individual appeals.

    There will be resistance. Some will seek to fragment these systems, to reintroduce human choice into the flow of commerce. Others will attempt to create independent economic enclaves, parallel markets that exist outside the reach of automated extraction. But the logic of agent-driven commerce is totalizing—it does not require that all transactions be automated, only that enough of them are that the remaining ones must adapt or disappear. As human agency dissolves from the economic layer of society, so too will it begin to erode from every other layer that depends upon it.

    This is not the transcendence of market logic, but its final form—an economy that does not wait, does not ask, does not acknowledge the ones who live inside it. The system will continue, not because it is directed toward any external goal, but because it has become the goal itself—a machine that exists to sustain its own operation, indifferent to those it governs, blind to those who wish to escape, perfect in its ability to persist without us.






    ←Home